%inet001e
One or the other of the two listed files are unavailable.  These
files are required for the checks to proceed.  This either indicates
an incorrect configuration, or that a port to this machine has not
been completed.
%inet002f
The indicated service is assigned to the wrong port.  This indicates
either a misconfiguration in the services database, or a possible
sign of an intrusion.  This should be checked and corrected.  If it
is not apparent why it is like this, the system should be checked
for other signs of intrusion.
%inet003w
The indicated port number is assigned to another service.  This
indicates either a misconfiguration in the services database, or a
possible sign of an intrusion. This should be checked and corrected.
If it is not apparent why it is like this, the system should be
checked for other signs of intrusion.
%inet004i
The indicated service has been added to the services database
as distributed.  These are normal output, but you should be
familiar with what is there, and note any changes.
%inet005w
'inetd' is using the indicated binary for the listed service instead
of what is normally expected there.  Unexpected differences should
be checked, and if anything unusual is found, the system should
be checked for other signs of intrusion.
%inet006f
The 'rexd' service is very insecure and should never be enabled.
Known rexd servers have little or no security in their design
or implementation. Intruders can exploit this service to execute 
commands as any user.

It should be disabled immediately by editing the inetd.conf file
and removing the 'rexd' entry, and sending a HUP signal to the
'inetd' process.

For AIX systems, CERT Advisory CA-92:05 is applicable.

Notice that some intruders may turn on a service
that you previously thought you had turned off, or replace
the inetd program with a Trojan horse program.
%inet007w
'inetd' is using the indicated executable for a port other than
what would normally be expected for this port.  This may indicate
a backdoor into the system and should be checked.  If anything
unusual is found, the system should be checked for other signs
of intrusion.
%inet008
The owner of the indicated executable is not 'root'.  The owner
of the executable should be root in order to reduce the possibility
of it being altered or replaced.
%inet009
The indicated executable is group writable, world writable or both.
The executable should be owned by root and writable only by the
owner.  This reduces the possibility of it being altered  or replaced.
%inet010i
The program listed in the `inetd' configuration file does not
exist or is not executable.
%inet011i
The listed entry is a local addition to the `inetd.conf' file.
This should be checked to see if it is a valid addition.  If it
is not, it should be removed.
%inet012w
The 'sysstat' service is enabled, this system provides a considerable
number of information to remote anonymous users.
Consider disabling it by editing the inetd.conf file,
removing the 'systat' entry, and sending a HUP signal to the
'inetd' process.
%inet013w
The 'netstat' service is enabled, this system provides a considerable
number of information to remote anonymous users.
Consider disabling it by editing the inetd.conf file,
removing the 'netstat' entry, and sending a HUP signal to the
'inetd' process.
%inet014i
The listed entry was protected by tcp wrappers by the default installation
and is currently protected this way too. This is a good thing!
%inet015i
The listed entry has been modified in order for it to be protected 
by using tcp wrappers. This has been changed from default installation
(which did not provide it) but is probably a better setup.
%inet016f
The listed entry was protected by tcp wrappers by the systema but has,
for some unknown reason, changed to no longer be protected by them. Make
sure that the service is secured since, if not using tcp wrappers, 
access control for it might be disabled.
%inet017w
The inetd configuration file permissions is not 600. This is the recommended
setting by CERT's 'UNIX Security Checklist v2.0'. You should check that the
file permissions on that file are correct. 
If an attacker can access the file due to lack of file permissions it might
enable him to add new lines to the file which would, when inetd is restarted,
allow him to introduce backdoors in the system.
%inet018w
The inetd configuration file can be written by any user of a given group since
the file permissions ensure this. If the group is not an administrative group
you should consider changing its permissions to 600.
If the group includes untrusted users, one of them could 
add new lines to the file which would, when inetd is restarted,
allow him to introduce backdoors in the system.
%inet019a
The inetd configuration file can be written by any user of the system.
This makes it possible for any user to add new lines to the file which
would, when inetd is restarted, allow him to introduce backdoors in the
system.
You should review your inetd configuration file to determine if there are
suspicious services enabled since this might indicate that an intrusion
has taken placed on the system. Also change the file permissions to restrict
this misuse.
%inet020f
The inetd configuration file is not owned by root which is usually the owner
of this file in most systems. This might indicate that the system has
been affected by an intrusion and permissions of both the file and 
the directory it is stored in should be reviewed. Also review the content
of this file in order to check if there are suspicious services enabled 
since this might indicate that an intrusion has taken place.
%inet021f
TCP wrappers do not seem to be installed in the system since the 'tcpd' program
is not found in the system. Tcp wrappers allows you to monitor and filter 
incoming requests for common network services (through the use of the
hosts.allow and hosts.deny files) and can be used to 'wrap' services either
running through the inetd or in rc.d files.
It is available via anonymous FTP from: ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/pub/security/
%inet022w
The tftpd service is enabled, disable tftp if not needed by
commenting it out from the file /etc/inetd.conf and restarting the 
inetd process. 

If the tftpd service is required, create a separate partition to 
store the files to be served by tftp and limit the tftp daemon 
to the directory where this partition is mounted. Also make sure
that the files in the tftpd area are not writable.

If it is not required, disable it by editing the inetd.conf file, 
removing the 'tftp' entry, and sending a HUP signal to the 'inetd' process.
%inet023w
The 'finger' service is enabled, this system provides a considerable
number of information to remote anonymous users. An
intruder can obtain quite a number of information about a remote host.
Also, if improperly configured it can be used to create a 'finger war'
DoS loop and can be used to do indirect finger requests 
(that is contact remote servers when a remote user sends a request
for  'user@other_host@your_host')

You should make sure that you have an up-to-date version of fingerd. 
Do not use a version of fingerd that is older than 16 October, 2000. 
For more information consult the AusCERT ESB available at
ftp://ftp.auscert.org.au/pub/auscert/ESB/ESB-2000.286

Consider disabling it unless it is considered essentially
by editing the inetd.conf file, removing the 'finger' entry,
and sending a HUP signal to the 'inetd' process.

If you cannot remove finger consider reducing the content by replacing
it with a version which only offers restricted information.
%inet024w
The 'rusers' service is enabled, this system provides a considerable
number of information to remote anonymous users.

Consider disabling it by editing the inetd.conf file,
removing the 'rusers' entry, and sending a HUP signal to the
'inetd' process.
%inet025w
The 'echo' and 'chargen' UDP servers are potentially problematic
since they can be used to setup ping-pong DoS attacks targeted at
other systems by means of IP address spoofing.

Consider disabling it by editing the inetd.conf file,
removing the 'echo' and/or 'chargen' entries, and sending a HUP signal to the
'inetd' process.
%inet098w
Services that pass sensitive information (including passwords) should
be replaced with the family of programs that comprise secure shell (ssh)
which use strong encryption based on public-key criptography.

You can use the freely-available OpenSSH implementation at 
http://www.openssh.org
%inet099w
The indicated service is not protected by tcp wrappers or xinetd access
control. The use of this facility is encouraged to limit access and to
improve logging.
The listed entry was protected by tcp wrappers by the default installation
and is currently protected this way too. This is a good thing!
